Asus P8H61 PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61 PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '23 at 06:26
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	MNG-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	49% Average	Memory 75.2 1-Core 79.3 2-Core 136 58% 96.9 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 184 19% 155 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Nvidia(10DE 1B82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	96.1% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 132 Parallax 134 99% 129 fps	MRender 94 Gravity 126 Splatting 112 91% 110 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD230S 256GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: 22Z0UCFJ SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 173 199 190 163 162 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.3% Above average	Read 163 Write 213 Mixed 192 SusWrite 172 42% 185 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 33.1 108% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 35.9 DQ Write 76.7 DQ Mixed 47.8 39% 53.5 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 114%
SSD 256GB 256GB 9,229 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 132GB free Firmware: V0823A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 171 198 215 215 94 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.9% Average	Read 228 Write 210 Mixed 212 SusWrite 173 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 20 89% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 34.5 DQ Write 76.5 DQ Mixed 25 28% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 166%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PULISIK D3 8G 1600 2x8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.8% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 18.2 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 16.8 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 91.5 44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	59	100	23.8"	1920 1017	AUS2421 ASUS VG249

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61 PLUS Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H61 PLUS

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	10x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	6x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	11x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	6x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x

SSD
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	6x
SATAIII 256GBIntensoBench 64%, 1,687 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	7x
ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,312 samples	6x
0B29 KAi-D3ZU1600M 12GBUnknownBench 41%, 4 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $563

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16