Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 167%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics170% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 02:00
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Memory 80
1-Core 173
2-Core 338
104% 197 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 1,058
103% 846 Pts
64-Core 1,500
93% 1,500 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan RTX-$1,369
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
170% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 213
Parallax 244
184% 228 fps
MRender 286
Gravity 238
Splatting 197
192% 240 fps
Poor: 134%
This bench: 170%
Great: 179%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1368 844 744 537 606 784 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 1,851
Write 3,481
Mixed 2,060
SusWrite 814
464% 2,051 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 78.8
266% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,430
DQ Write 1,059
DQ Mixed 1,234
925% 1,241 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 262%
Great: 486%
Intel 520 Series 480GB-$249
160GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 209 205 205 206 201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 470
Write 298
Mixed 316
SusWrite 204
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 24.9
89% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 135
106% 149 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 71%
Samsung MZQLB1T9HAJR-00007 2TB
726GB free
Firmware: EDA5202Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1584 1758 1754 1723 1700 1606 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2239
Write 1,769
Mixed 1,242
SusWrite 1,687
388% 1,734 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 60.2
226% 84.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,428
DQ Write 1,132
DQ Mixed 1,250
943% 1,270 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 318%
Great: 373%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
215GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 457 455 451 449 432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 360
Mixed 429
SusWrite 446
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 51.8
170% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HUS726060ALA640 6TB
898GB free
Firmware: AHGNT1E2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 107 107 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 34.8
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 37
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 170 26.9" 1280 720 GBT270D M27Q
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,216
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback