Acer Aspire A315-24P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-24P  (all builds)
MotherboardMDC Herbag_MDU
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230707
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 22:39
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 60.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 188
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 466
50% 397 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1654) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.24.01
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 10.7
2% 8.27 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 6
Splatting 6
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-1T00-1114 1TB
813GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70659000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 515 501 455 531 511 508 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 582
Write 536
Mixed 512
SusWrite 504
120% 534 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 42.5
134% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 437
323% 439 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D8DR-031 WT 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 18.6
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 2R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 31% 32 135 59 60 15.5" 1536 793 AUOE997
Typical Aspire A315-24P Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-24P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback