Acer Aspire A315-24P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-24P  (all builds)
MotherboardMDC Herbag_MDU
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 17:57
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 61.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 222
70% 130 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 502
55% 434 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1654) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.24.01
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.09% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 11.4
5% 9.6 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 6.2
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.09%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-1T00-1114 1TB
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70659000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1183 1228 1167 1261 1246 563 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,056
Write 1,150
Mixed 1,102
SusWrite 1108
250% 1104 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 40.6
132% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 936
DQ Write 420
DQ Mixed 750
537% 702 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 181%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D8DR-031 WT 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 26.8
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 20.8
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO0C9C
Typical Aspire A315-24P Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-24P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback