MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory38.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 21:39
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 948
93% 762 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 883C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 177
Parallax 165
149% 175 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 138
Splatting 118
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
782GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1507 1764 1539 1178 1183 1175 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,284
Write 2,108
Mixed 1,365
SusWrite 1,391
400% 1,787 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 61.2
203% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 1,126
DQ Write 1,156
DQ Mixed 1,075
826% 1,119 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 290%
Great: 372%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 631 685 697 702 689 697 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,001
Write 767
Mixed 584
SusWrite 683
170% 759 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 37
128% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 458
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 389
294% 396 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 139%
Great: 867%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 537GB
488GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 993 952 918 905 931 903 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 85%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 352 365 355 407 326 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 357
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 361
233% 322 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 2.7
782% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 239%
Great: 293%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$7
12GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 23 20 18 19 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 143
Write 102
Mixed 112
SusWrite 32.9
123% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 4.2
278% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 39%
WDC WDS 500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
460GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 53.9
Write 36.8
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 39.6
55% 42.4 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 10.6
766% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 12.6
DQ Write 17.5
DQ Mixed 14.3
1,128% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 227%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 029E CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 30.5
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 29.2
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 75 27.6" 1280 720 GSM5BF5 LG SDQHD
Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $865
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback