MSI MS-1795

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GP72 6QF
MotherboardMSI MS-1795  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 13:19
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.6% Poor
Memory 35.9
1-Core 39
2-Core 68.3
29% 47.7 Pts
4-Core 94.4
8-Core 143
15% 119 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
MSI(1462 115B) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4633
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 20.2
18% 19.9 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 16.5
16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ256G8NY 256GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 8.8 8.2 6.2 4.7 6.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 50% Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
310GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 47 45 46 55 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 126
Write 60.5
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 48.3
46% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 75%
Jmicron Tech 240GB
7GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 31 29 27 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE M471A1K43BB0-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 20 60 17.3" 1920 1017 CMN1735
Typical MS-1795 Builds (Compare 1,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1795

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback