Lenovo 80TU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80TU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Torronto 4C2
Memory3.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '23 at 09:33
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 116
54% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 224
29% 221 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 39F1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 6.1
4% 4.7 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 7
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 256GB 256GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0503A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 64 52 38 47 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 426
Write 379
Mixed 328
SusWrite 56.5
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 20.9
93% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 15.4
51% 112 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 187%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
310GB free
Firmware: AX1P6E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 91 91 90 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 86.4
Write 88.5
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 90.3
54% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3AZ Kingston 99U5403-159.A01LF 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 8.3
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14A9
Typical 80TU Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80TU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback