Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	65.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150602
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '23 at 22:41
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 194 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 508 52% 423 Pts	64-Core 525 32% 525 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% XFX(1682 9587) CLim: 1600 MHz, MLim: 2042 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Lighting 85.3 Reflection 70.3 Parallax 109 70% 88.1 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 94.2 Splatting 54.3 58% 72.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3Z40107 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 472 Write 412 Mixed 378 94% 421 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 26.3 108% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 45.5 88% 170 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 54GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 113 107 108 144 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 159 Write 126 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 124 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 32GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 16.3 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 18.1 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 44: 0P 5R 5G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
44%	14%	102	497	393	60	42"	1280 720	BBY4213 NS-42L260A13

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	133x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	97x
Core i5-4440Intel $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	58x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	57x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	36x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $236

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16