Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_A1502ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics9.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_A1502ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1502ZA
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime10.5 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 13:26
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 25.1
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 121
35% 67.3 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 224
27% 209 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1D52) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
9.2% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 10.9
9% 11.3 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 11.6
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.2%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 501 473 588 108 221 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 666
Write 311
Mixed 457
SusWrite 330
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 36.4
124% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 202
145% 190 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
20.6% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 2.2
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 547
7% 547 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 43 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0946
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_A1502ZA Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_A1502ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback