Intel X79G-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79G-A  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 04:16
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 74
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 135
56% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 490
46% 382 Pts
64-Core 684
42% 684 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 30.2
Reflection 57.1
Parallax 47.4
25% 44.9 fps
MRender 58.3
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 42.2
37% 45.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
X12 256GB 256GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3414B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 93 18 17 83 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 466
Write 428
Mixed 348
SusWrite 98
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 12.1
76% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 14.8
40% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSZF1G72PZ- 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 16
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 32" 1280 720 HJW0001 HDMI TO USB
Typical X79G-A Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79G-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback