Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 20:10
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 190
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 402
43% 344 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 6.9
5% 6 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.9
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
It512-p330 2280 512GB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SHFM3A.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 372 395 369 364 363 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
107% Outstanding
Read 397
Write 416
Mixed 398
SusWrite 374
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 48.6
170% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 258
217% 314 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GHT16G8SCL226P-32 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.1
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 14" 1280 720 XYK1200 Display
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback