PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds) |
Memory | 23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20230825 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 12 '23 at 19:40 |
Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
Run User | PER-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-7940X-$654
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
79.6%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1553 1504 1380 1354 1295 1203 MB/s
|
253%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
396GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 135 136 135 136 MB/s
|
78.1%
Very good
|
|||
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
587GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 131 129 131 128 MB/s
|
80.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Toshiba MK5059GSX 500GB
156GB free
Firmware: GK003U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 55 55 54 53 MB/s
|
26.9%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
64.7%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 34 | 4 | 60 | 23.1" | 1920 1009 | GSM5A23 23MP55 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 181x |
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 135x |
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 121x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 81x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 69x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 39x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $1,132 |