Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507VV4_FX507VV4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive558% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507VV4_FX507VV4  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX507VV4
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230705
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 18:25
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 71.8
1-Core 162
2-Core 325
97% 186 Pts
4-Core 649
8-Core 1,049
104% 849 Pts
64-Core 1,480
92% 1,480 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 265D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 24.2
16% 22.6 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 16.9
8% 8.63 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Viper VP4300L 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08193 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4080 4080 3851 3953 3819 2468 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
558% Outstanding
Read 4,241
Write 4595
Mixed 3,152
SusWrite 3,709
884% 3,924 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 111
367% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,218
DQ Write 907
DQ Mixed 1,032
780% 1,052 MB/s
Poor: 204%
This bench: 558%
Great: 558%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax GSOH22F-18---------- 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 36.9
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 25.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0B70 NE156FHM-NX6
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507VV4_FX507VV4 Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507VV4_FX507VV4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback