Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 16:01
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 52.4
2-Core 86
44% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 210
24% 186 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 12A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 237
Parallax 169
136% 191 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 149
Splatting 124
122% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$198
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 71 100 130 124 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 387
Write 72
Mixed 102
SusWrite 105
36% 166 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 15.3
58% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 76.4
DQ Mixed 96.5
82% 124 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 122%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
3GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 21 22 24 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
128GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 195 216 243 238 242 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 490
Write 478
Mixed 453
SusWrite 223
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 30.2
131% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 227
173% 234 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
19GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 414
Mixed 402
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 41.4
120% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 286
217% 293 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZR Skill Intl F4-3000C16-8GTZR Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZR Skill Intl F4-3000C16-8GTZR 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.9% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 21.9
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 20.5
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 ACR03AA Acer H276HL
Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $671
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback