ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	233% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-F8 GAMING
Memory	58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221029
Uptime	9.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '23 at 15:34
Run Duration	224 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 3,842 User benchmarks, average bench 83% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Memory 85.8 1-Core 117 2-Core 236 82% 146 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 722 72% 587 Pts	64-Core 927 57% 927 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$767 46,082 User benchmarks, average bench 240% Gainward(10B0 F299) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.29 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	233% Outstanding	Lighting 336 Reflection 326 Parallax 345 274% 336 fps	MRender 467 Gravity 290 Splatting 210 251% 322 fps
Poor: 208% ↑ This bench: 233% Great: 256%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$33 33,719 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 394GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAGA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,336 Write 519 Mixed 536 174% 797 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 32.7 111% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 535 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 346 285% 412 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 216%
MK001920GWSSE 2TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 1.5TB free Firmware: HPG1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 438 Write 432 Mixed 401 95% 424 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 60.3 4K Mixed 43.7 133% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 355 267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 125%
VK001920GWEZE 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 266GB free Firmware: HPG6 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 405 Write 432 Mixed 304 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 59.3 4K Mixed 27.2 97% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 252 194% 259 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 102%
MT006400KWSTD 6.5TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 6TB free Firmware: HPK2 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 1,364 Write 1,650 Mixed 1,305 323% 1,440 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 88.3 4K Mixed 45.3 154% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 586 DQ Write 512 DQ Mixed 531 403% 543 MB/s
Poor: 229% Great: 251%
Hitachi HUS724040ALA640 4TB 1,620 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1TB free Firmware: AA70 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 116 Write 116 Mixed 63.5 73% 98.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 97%
HP 8GB_EM_USB_Drive 8GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 25.4 Write 11.9 Mixed 12 18% 16.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K43CB2-CVF 4x16GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	114% Outstanding	MC Read 40.3 MC Write 51.7 MC Mixed 42.2 128% 44.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 19.5 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	165	31.5"	1280 720	MSI3DB4 MSI AG321CQR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback