ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 195% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 177% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	233% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-F8 GAMING
Memory	59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '23 at 20:13
Run Duration	246 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 3,842 User benchmarks, average bench 83% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Memory 84.5 1-Core 118 2-Core 238 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 739 73% 599 Pts	64-Core 923 57% 923 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$767 46,082 User benchmarks, average bench 240% Gainward(10B0 F299) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	233% Outstanding	Lighting 337 Reflection 325 Parallax 347 274% 336 fps	MRender 465 Gravity 291 Splatting 210 250% 322 fps
Poor: 208% ↑ This bench: 233% Great: 256%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$33 33,719 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 396GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAGA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 437 438 436 437 437 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 1431 Write 519 Mixed 543 SusWrite 440 161% 733 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 34.3 115% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 507 DQ Write 450 DQ Mixed 322 284% 427 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 216%
MK001920GWSSE 2TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 1.5TB free Firmware: HPG1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 434 440 446 442 444 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 445 Write 444 Mixed 403 SusWrite 441 98% 433 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 59.6 4K Mixed 38.3 126% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 356 267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 125%
VK001920GWEZE 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 268GB free Firmware: HPG6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 353 345 342 341 343 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 426 Write 445 Mixed 321 SusWrite 346 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 28 96% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 234 185% 252 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 102%
MT006400KWSTD 6.5TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 6TB free Firmware: HPK2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1719 1813 1807 1797 1799 1799 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	245% Outstanding	Read 1,268 Write 1,713 Mixed 1,216 SusWrite 1,789 339% 1,496 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 90.3 4K Mixed 47.6 158% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 929 DQ Write 679 DQ Mixed 795 596% 801 MB/s
Poor: 229% ↑ This bench: 245% Great: 251%
Hitachi HUS724040ALA640 4TB 1,620 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1TB free Firmware: AA70 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 126 124 125 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	72% Very good	Read 126 Write 111 Mixed 69 SusWrite 125 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K43CB2-CVF 4x16GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	113% Outstanding	MC Read 40.2 MC Write 51.5 MC Mixed 41.9 127% 44.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 20.7 SC Mixed 20.2 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	165	31.5"	1280 720	MSI3DB4 MSI AG321CQR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback