QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory184.4 GB free of 192 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 13:36
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 30 cores, 30 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 158
54% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 601
54% 456 Pts
64-Core 1,600
99% 1,600 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 96%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 537GB
432GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 7.8 6.8 7.4 6.8 5.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 651
Write 1
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 7.3
34% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Mixed 2.3
8% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 60%
Qemu HARDDISK 1.5TB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 7.2 6.1 7 6.3 5.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.5% Average
Read 137
Write 42.5
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 6.7
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.5
266% 1.87 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 12x16GB
12 of 12 slots used
192GB DIMM RAM
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
165% Outstanding
MC Read 70.2
MC Write 66.1
MC Mixed 69.8
196% 68.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 19.1
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 107%
This bench: 165%
Great: 478%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 34 25 0 0" 1294 1008
Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback