Vultr VOC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemVultr VOC  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory184.8 GB free of 192 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '23 at 21:23
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC-Rome
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 65.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 245
78% 145 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 962
85% 721 Pts
64-Core 4,317
267% 4,317 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 84%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
947GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1086 1148 1091 1132 1264 1184 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 19% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 12x16GB
12 of 12 slots used
192GB DIMM RAM
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
478% Outstanding
MC Read 308
MC Write 125
MC Mixed 179
584% 204 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 48.8
SC Mixed 31
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 107%
This bench: 478%
Great: 478%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback