Dell Precision 5820 Tower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision 5820 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06JWJY
Memory52.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200414
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 10:58
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2275
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 71.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 257
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 951
86% 724 Pts
64-Core 1995
124% 1995 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Dell(1028 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.9% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 133
Parallax 121
96% 124 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 105
Splatting 115
104% 130 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM881 SATA 256GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15300009
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 478
Mixed 441
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 62.3
210% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 230
193% 282 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Nvme KXG60PNV2T04 NVM 2TB
144GB free
Firmware: 4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,978
Write 2128
Mixed 1,590
424% 1,899 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 79.1
266% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,052
DQ Write 816
DQ Mixed 912
688% 927 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 325%
SH00R1TB 1TB
789GB free
Firmware: HP2818E3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 432
Write 460
Mixed 367
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 1
134% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 1
74% 176 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 99%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
680GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 330
Write 372
Mixed 335
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 27.1
88% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 184
134% 173 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
764GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 93.8
Write 90.6
Mixed 72.1
64% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 136
Write 157
Mixed 157
198% 150 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
56% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 70%
TOSHIBA HDWD260 6TB
237GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 199
Write 173
Mixed 99.7
190% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
216% 2.57 MB/s
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
860GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 98.2
Write 112
Mixed 108
140% 106 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
53% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7CJR8N-VK 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 56.8
MC Mixed 37.8
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 10.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 27" 1280 720 DELA19C DELL S2721DS
Typical Precision 5820 Tower Builds (Compare 2,615 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

System: Dell Precision 5820 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback