ONDA A520SD4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemONDA A520SD4  (all builds)
MotherboardONDA A520SD4
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 07:26
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 4100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 65.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 259
82% 154 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 711
70% 572 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Nvidia(10DE 1F03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.2% Good
Lighting 80.5
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 85.8
66% 78.7 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 63.5
65% 81.7 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3105A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 380 403 406 410 410 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 471
Write 419
Mixed 369
SusWrite 379
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 13
102% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 15.6
75% 165 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 130%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
464GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 179 181 179 179 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 168
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 179
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 101%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KS3200D4M13508G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 30
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 24.7
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 0P 1R 3G 15B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 20% 94 351 191 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical A520SD4 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: ONDA A520SD4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $684
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback