Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181122
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 04:41
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 217
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 417
55% 411 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Asus(1043 0513) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 21.8
13% 21.5 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 24.6
18% 22 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK66.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 257 153 181 74 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 346
Write 138
Mixed 283
SusWrite 186
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 31.5
117% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 200
173% 254 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
646GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 162 164 165 166 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 142
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 164
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
400GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 104 105 104 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 88.3
Write 102
Mixed 9.9
SusWrite 104
54% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 15.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 10 60 12.6" 1920 1017 AGO0001
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $348
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback