Acer Aspire TC-885

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-885  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-885
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 00:46
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 221
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 404
51% 386 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.7% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 96.6
55% 77.7 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 79.6
Splatting 52.7
54% 67.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VK000240GXAWE 240GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 283 265 298 289 282 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.1% Very good
Read 299
Write 286
Mixed 230
SusWrite 283
62% 274 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 26.2
95% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 242
188% 255 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO2P26KC8T1-BPYS 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.2
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 VSC7836 VG2248
Typical Aspire TC-885 Builds (Compare 1,855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-885

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback