Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_F1502ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_F1502ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1502ZA
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '23 at 00:11
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PRI-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 66.6
1-Core 162
2-Core 316
95% 182 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 769
78% 631 Pts
64-Core 996
62% 996 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1D52) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 24.4
16% 22.7 fps
MRender 20.5
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 19.2
18% 23.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 835 848 922 802 1000 1108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,996
Write 1,189
Mixed 1,008
SusWrite 919
284% 1,278 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 69.4
235% 78.1 MB/s
DQ Read 412
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 387
272% 347 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 224%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 25.8
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 21.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0946
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_F1502ZA Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_F1502ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback