Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory51.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201222
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 23:38
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 210
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 591
58% 476 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 856D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 46.2
Parallax 45.5
34% 44.5 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 35.9
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
737GB free
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 603
Write 538
Mixed 564
127% 569 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 54.6
175% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 706
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 562
426% 578 MB/s
Poor: 215% Great: 537%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
649GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 185
Write 164
Mixed 90.7
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Elements 1TB
366GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 39.2
Mixed 42.8
70% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
3GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.7
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.2
11% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
21GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 146
Write 46.8
Mixed 27.9
72% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
102% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 26.1
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 24.8
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 120 29.1" 1280 720 VTK2900 GNV29CB
Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,811 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $367
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback