Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 19:20
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$127
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 150
2-Core 280
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 938
84% 710 Pts
64-Core 1,054
65% 1,054 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.5% Average
Lighting 58.1
Reflection 60
Parallax 80.4
47% 66.2 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 44.7
45% 56.3 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1216 932 303 245 259 259 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,568
Write 1,694
Mixed 1533
SusWrite 536
300% 1,333 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 60.8
203% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 673
DQ Write 433
DQ Mixed 555
413% 554 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 183%
Great: 295%
Mushkin ECO2 60GB
50GB free
Firmware: 604ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 56 55 54 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (93rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.8% Average
Read 240
Write 63.5
Mixed 95.6
SusWrite 57
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 26.3
102% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 43.8
DQ Write 63.1
DQ Mixed 53.5
40% 53.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 53%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 33 39 29 31 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
911GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 121 123 122 121 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 121
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 101%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 320GB
77GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 39 40 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 33.7
Write 36.5
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 39.5
25% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 33.9
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 29.1
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 34.7
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 100 27" 1280 720 AUS2744 VA27DQF
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $932
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback