Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '23 at 03:58
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 79.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 269
91% 166 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 982
89% 746 Pts
64-Core 1,123
70% 1,123 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
45% Average
Lighting 55.9
Reflection 57.6
Parallax 78.1
46% 63.9 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 43.8
44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1040 718 679 1057 756 645 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,433
Write 1,781
Mixed 1,445
SusWrite 816
309% 1,369 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 66.5
197% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 773
DQ Write 545
DQ Mixed 690
507% 670 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 199%
Great: 295%
Mushkin ECO2 60GB
50GB free
Firmware: 604ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 56 60 59 55 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (93rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.3% Average
Read 276
Write 62.1
Mixed 106
SusWrite 57.1
27% 125 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 27.5
102% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 44.5
DQ Write 57.4
DQ Mixed 52.3
39% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 53%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 42 43 29 41 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
963GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 116 119 116 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 105
Write 91.4
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 116
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 101%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 320GB
78GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 38 39 40 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 32.5
Write 39.5
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 38.8
25% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 58%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
4.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 155 155 157 157 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 152
Write 151
Mixed 118
SusWrite 156
196% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 28.3
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 27.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 60 23.5" 1280 720 VIZ1005 E24-C1
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $939
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback