Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151023
Uptime	8.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '23 at 09:33
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 105 2-Core 206 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 383 49% 372 Pts	64-Core 386 24% 386 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% PowerColor(148C 2358) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.4% Average	Lighting 62.5 Reflection 71.2 Parallax 81.5 51% 71.7 fps	MRender 62 Gravity 57.9 Splatting 43.4 43% 54.4 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4304RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 84 85 26 55 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 376 Write 307 Mixed 260 SusWrite 75.1 57% 254 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 33.4 4K Mixed 11.7 54% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 98.8 DQ Mixed 18.4 38% 77.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 56%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 878GB free Firmware: SDM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 123 124 124 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 79.2 Write 110 Mixed 65.5 SusWrite 123 69% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.7 201% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDD1 2x8GB 625 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 21.6 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 27.5 SC Mixed 21.9 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	28.9"	1280 720	PHL0000 PHILIPS FTV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	590x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	459x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	459x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	558x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	394x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	240x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	193x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	132x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	121x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	91x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	89x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $425

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16