Samsung 730QDA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 730QDA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP730QDA-KA1US
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230613
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateDec 11 '23 at 06:21
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 178
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 356
38% 304 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Sanyo(144D C860) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.71% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 14.5
7% 12.3 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 14.3
Splatting 16
12% 15.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.71%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-000 512GB
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV70K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 158 177 180 164 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 947
Write 216
Mixed 243
SusWrite 168
85% 393 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 40.3
164% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 452
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 274
204% 281 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 111%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 56.7
MC Mixed 38.6
124% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 15
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 0P 2R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 26% 27 110 54 60 13.3" 1536 864 BOE08FA
Typical 730QDA Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 730QDA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback