User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemECT
MotherboardMSI B85M-G43 (MS-7823)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 22:47
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 173
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 238
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 4040 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 119
Parallax 125
106% 124 fps
MRender 159
Gravity 112
Splatting 101
99% 124 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
512gb SSD 510GB
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3215A6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 248 301 371 308 349 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 154
Write 102
Mixed 130
SusWrite 285
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Mixed 5.8
58% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 82%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 127 129 130 130 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 111
Write 122
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 127
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 1315 CT51264BA160B.C16F Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 SAM7311 S24C31x
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback