Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL SKYBAY
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170822
Uptime20.6 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 15:35
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900TE
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 54
1-Core 47.4
2-Core 67.1
36% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 67.2
8-Core 76.6
9% 71.9 Pts
64-Core 68.5
4% 68.5 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)
Intel(8086 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
2.32% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.5 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.32%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 61 65 62 78 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 96.2
Write 90.8
Mixed 38
SusWrite 64.6
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 67%
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37
296GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 60.8
Write 86.8
Mixed 34.4
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AQD-SD4U4GN24-SG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.07% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.6
8% 2.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 1
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 334
12% 334 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.07%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 20 60 24.2" 1280 720 CHR7511 CH7511B
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback