Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-14X

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-14X (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140422
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '23 at 05:09
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100 14,372 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Memory 83 1-Core 60.3 2-Core 102 53% 81.6 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 146 19% 143 Pts	64-Core 142 9% 142 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.01% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.7 3% 2.73 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.4 3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.01% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nexdrive 512GB 512GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 379GB free (System drive) Firmware: W0714A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 350 122 142 322 148 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 402 Write 363 Mixed 344 SusWrite 242 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 21.5 85% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 51.4 82% 160 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-YK0 2x4GB 950 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.5% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 15.2 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 12 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	43	22	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD033A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C55-A-14X Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-14X

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	2x

SSD
512GB 512GBNexdriveBench 86%, 7 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 950 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16