Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B150M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160314
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 09 '23 at 03:41
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 193
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 380
51% 382 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Asus(1043 04BE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1326 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 43.7
23% 33.6 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 26.8
24% 29.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 77 65 51 69 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 228
Write 152
Mixed 166
SusWrite 67.6
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 23.2
63% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 95.4
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 156
101% 118 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 38%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
230GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 154
Write 142
Mixed 76.8
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
625GB free
Firmware: CC54
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 54.4
Mixed 67.5
57% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
925GB free
Firmware: 0710
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 90.6
Write 100
Mixed 69.8
65% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 66%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
218GB free
Firmware: 9300
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 65
Write 79.4
Mixed 53.8
49% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
146% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 65%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
304GB free
Firmware: 9300
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 99.9
Write 107
Mixed 69.4
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
163% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 65%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
705GB free
Firmware: SC60
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 185
Write 169
Mixed 86.7
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.2
603% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Seagate Portable 5TB
423GB free
Firmware: 0712
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 91.9
Write 44
Mixed 32.8
41% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.3
125% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 67%
WD Elements 2621 5TB
494GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 86
Write 79.5
Mixed 55.6
91% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 63%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
100GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 128
Write 59.2
Mixed 53
88% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.1
69% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAD11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.4% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 23.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 20.9
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 31.5" 1280 720 MEIA296 Panasonic-TV
Typical GA-B150M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 2,398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback