Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 476% UFO	Desktop 125% UFO	Workstation 645% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 128%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	390% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	55.3 GB free of 64 GB
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230928
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '23 at 22:15
Run Duration	460 Seconds
Run User	QAT-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-13900K-$475 49,132 User benchmarks, average bench 129% LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	128% Outstanding	Memory 83.3 1-Core 232 2-Core 462 133% 259 Pts	4-Core 925 8-Core 1,825 163% 1,375 Pts	64-Core 4350 269% 4350 Pts
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 135%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,800 25,956 User benchmarks, average bench 370% Asus(1043 88F1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 545.92 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	390% Outstanding	Lighting 626 Reflection 589 Parallax 773 510% 663 fps	MRender 536 Gravity 570 Splatting 302 367% 469 fps
Poor: 303% ↑ This bench: 390% Great: 407%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1684 1549 1389 1368 1319 1255 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	345% Outstanding	Read 2,613 Write 1,996 Mixed 1271 SusWrite 1,427 408% 1,827 MB/s	4K Read 59.8 4K Write 197 4K Mixed 87 306% 115 MB/s	DQ Read 1,418 DQ Write 1,209 DQ Mixed 1348 1,001% 1,325 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 345% Great: 393%
T-force TM8FP8002T 2TB 870 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 591GB free Firmware: VC0S036I SusWrite @10s intervals: 1554 1553 1551 338 299 291 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	227% Outstanding	Read 1,839 Write 1563 Mixed 1,262 SusWrite 931 313% 1,399 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 55.1 185% 66.1 MB/s	DQ Read 744 DQ Write 1,004 DQ Mixed 905 675% 884 MB/s
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 227% Great: 274%
T-force TM8FP8002T 2TB 870 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 707GB free Firmware: VC0S036I SusWrite @10s intervals: 972 1010 978 979 968 1007 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 1,943 Write 925 Mixed 1,088 SusWrite 986 274% 1,235 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 21.4 4K Mixed 27.3 109% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 737 DQ Write 597 DQ Mixed 415 380% 583 MB/s
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 274%
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270 3,707 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 535GB free Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 398 399 399 398 399 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 330 Write 399 Mixed 281 SusWrite 398 80% 352 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 76 4K Mixed 35.6 125% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 132 120% 183 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 104%
TOSHIBA MG08ACA14TE 14TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 90 88 89 89 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	67.1% Good	Read 201 Write 204 Mixed 88.9 SusWrite 89 187% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.6 227% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 92%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 88 90 89 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 160 Write 140 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 89.3 155% 120 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 1 510% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 10.8 DQ Mixed 0.7 393% 4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 100%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 88 90 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 140 Write 143 Mixed 104 SusWrite 89.3 159% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 61%
TOSHIBA MG08ACA14TE 14TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 88 90 90 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	60.8% Good	Read 174 Write 215 Mixed 99.3 SusWrite 89.1 191% 144 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 201% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 92%
WDC WD40 00FYYZ-01UL1B1 4TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 419GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 21 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33% Below average	Read 129 Write 131 Mixed 94 SusWrite 20.5 120% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.1 147% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 54%
WDC WD40 00FYYZ-01UL1B1 4TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 816GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 21 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.2% Below average	Read 126 Write 132 Mixed 98.2 SusWrite 20.5 121% 94 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 147% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 54%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 114 Write 145 Mixed 111 SusWrite 20.3 130% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.8 202% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 73%
WDC WD80 PURZ-85YNPY0 8TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 21 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.3% Below average	Read 150 Write 156 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 20.5 123% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.4 116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 37%
WDC WD40 00FYYZ-01UL1B1 4TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 3TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 21 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.3% Below average	Read 124 Write 129 Mixed 91.9 SusWrite 20.5 118% 91.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 54%
WDC WD40 00FYYZ-01UL1B1 4TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 844GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 126 123 126 124 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.5% Above average	Read 155 Write 154 Mixed 108 SusWrite 124 181% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 150% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 54%
ST14000N M0018-2H4101 14TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 21 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.4% Excellent	Read 142 Write 140 Mixed 158 SusWrite 20.5 152% 115 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 16.6 4K Mixed 0.9 664% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 13.3 DQ Mixed 1.5 507% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 80%
WDC WD40 00FYYZ-01UL1B1 4TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 424GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 151 152 150 152 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.4% Above average	Read 96.7 Write 98 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 151 145% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 143% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5600C36 4x16GB 1,024 User benchmarks, average bench 165% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5400 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	183% Outstanding	MC Read 73.7 MC Write 71.9 MC Mixed 69.2 205% 71.6 GB/s	SC Read 23.5 SC Write 52.7 SC Mixed 36.4 107% 37.5 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 124% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 192%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	72	60	120	41.5"	1280 720	AUS42E0 PG42UQ

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z690 FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 239%

UFO

Desktop 116%

UFO

Workstation 280%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 FORMULA

CPU
Core i9-12900KIntel $291Bench 117%, 66,991 samples	610x
Core i9-13900KIntel $475Bench 129%, 49,132 samples	116x
Core i9-12900KSIntel $349Bench 119%, 7,188 samples	100x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $835Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	367x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	165x
RTX 4090Nvidia $1,800Bench 370%, 25,956 samples	143x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $169Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	216x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	191x
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TBBench 437%, 13,468 samples	41x

RAM
Skill Intl F5-6400J3239G162x16GBGBench 186%, 14,947 samples	82x
CMT32GX5M2B5600C36 4x16GBCorsairBench 165%, 1,024 samples	78x
CMT32GX5M2B5600C36 2x16GBCorsairBench 167%, 4,540 samples	77x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,295

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16