MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 20:48
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 726
69% 569 Pts
64-Core 1,084
67% 1,084 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
MSI(1462 5027) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 140
Parallax 235
97% 165 fps
MRender 225
Gravity 126
Splatting 192
148% 181 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 112%
Great: 116%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
524GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1235 1051 1011 997 976 948 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,408
Write 2,260
Mixed 1,742
SusWrite 1,036
417% 1,862 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 65.1
213% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 447
DQ Mixed 653
474% 623 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 253%
Great: 435%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 479 480 479 476 480 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 483
Mixed 439
SusWrite 479
107% 477 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 46.5
152% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 367
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 114%
Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
529GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 480 480 479 476 480 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 484
Mixed 457
SusWrite 479
108% 481 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 48.7
160% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 367
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 116%
Great: 132%
SABRENT 2TB
879GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 106%
WD Game Drive 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 99 98 99 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 74.9
Write 113
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 98.5
127% 90 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 66%
WD Game Drive 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2639
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 115 116 115 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 125
Write 106
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 116
142% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 0.7
331% 3.63 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 0.6
372% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 71%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.8% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15.9
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 10 100 43.4" 3840 1129 SAM0F5A C43J89x
Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $637
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback