Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110201
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '18 at 23:19
Run Duration	718 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5675 8,072 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 95.5 1-Core 94.3 2-Core 169 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 608 59% 483 Pts	64-Core 719 44% 719 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% MSI(1462 3415) CLim: 1291 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12.2 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.1% Average	Lighting 59.6 Reflection 65.3 Parallax 79.6 48% 68.2 fps	MRender 67.9 Gravity 62.7 Splatting 56 50% 62.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 38GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7541 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1414 (B1) Unknown 99 99 13 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 47 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 86 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4232313232	62.3% Good	Read 379 Write 194 Mixed 240 60% 271 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 19.5 98% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 19.2 47% 100 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2882 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 598 (B1) Unknown 98 98 22 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 51 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 69 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8178344388	58.2% Above average	Read 380 Write 193 Mixed 241 60% 271 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 43 4K Mixed 20.3 98% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 36.2 DQ Write 51.4 DQ Mixed 19.4 22% 35.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 10GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 189 183 6533 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3740 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 21252 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3734 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 442 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 5 5 586259 (C2) HDA temperature 116 97 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	31.5% Below average	Read 54.3 Write 55.2 Mixed 50 40% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.2 66% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 59%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 817GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 35 Write 34.6 Mixed 33.3 44% 34.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.18 60% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 44%
Samsung STORY Station 1.5TB 903 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 755GB free, PID 5f06 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 36.4 Write 37.8 Mixed 36.9 48% 37 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.25 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 20%
Kingston DataTraveler 102 4GB 235 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 162d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	3.02% Terrible	Read 13.4 Write 2.12 Mixed 3.81 6% 6.43 MB/s	4K Read 2.37 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 10% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.02% Great: 7%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 0GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	9.84% Terrible	Read 31.2 Write 8.65 Mixed 5.95 15% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.87 4K Write 0.82 4K Mixed 0.4 56% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.84% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	49% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 18.2 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 12.3 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 55.7 72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD5 Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	80x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	58x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	18x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	9x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	75x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	44x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $259

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16