Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '23 at 14:01
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 2,292 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 88 1-Core 91.2 2-Core 175 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 415 44% 352 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E258) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Lighting 23.9 Reflection 25.9 Parallax 31.4 20% 27.1 fps	MRender 23.9 Gravity 24.7 Splatting 24 20% 24.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 257 269 278 279 278 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 391 Write 346 Mixed 313 SusWrite 283 75% 333 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 43.1 143% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 43.7 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 55.7 48% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 118%
JMicron Generic 256GB 157 User benchmarks, average bench 130% 78GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 245 249 256 255 255 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	183% Outstanding	Read 305 Write 256 Mixed 187 SusWrite 250 329% 250 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 25.9 4K Mixed 17.9 1,561% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 29 DQ Mixed 19.6 1,729% 23.1 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 256%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Team-Elite-1600 PSD34G133381 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 10.6 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 11.4 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	27"	1280 720	ACR0A8E QG270 H3

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	159x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	120x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	50x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $214

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16