Acer ConceptD CT500-51A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer ConceptD CT500-51A  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ConceptD CT500-51A
Memory54.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191030
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 13:08
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 74.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 255
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 872
81% 676 Pts
64-Core 1,181
73% 1,181 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.7% Outstanding
Lighting 109
Reflection 191
Parallax 116
89% 139 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 103
Splatting 110
103% 128 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1300_MTFDDAK512TDL 512GB
431GB free
Firmware: M5MA000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 418
Write 459
Mixed 375
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 43.1
140% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 328
250% 338 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 116%
WDC PC SN720 SED SDAQNTW-1T00 1TB
696GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10103100
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,745
Write 2,105
Mixed 1,760
419% 1870 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 51.5
168% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 814
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 652
493% 669 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 285%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 172
Write 175
Mixed 21.8
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 64GB
20GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23.8
Write 4.5
Mixed 17.8
17% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.4
149% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9D8ME-16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
77.4% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 26.7
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 15.9
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 45 120 27" 1280 720 ACR0716 CP3271K P
Typical ConceptD CT500-51A Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

System: Acer ConceptD CT500-51A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $399
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback