Bytespeed Performance Q87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	72% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Bytespeed Performance Q87M-E (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory	24 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140612
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '23 at 07:24
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 189 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 441 48% 382 Pts	64-Core 496 31% 496 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Gigabyte(1458 4013) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72% Very good	Lighting 89.2 Reflection 88.8 Parallax 82.3 73% 86.8 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 80.8 Splatting 72.2 71% 88.8 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 2TB 2TB 782 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2TB free Firmware: ZD0R3G0F SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 194 48 46 47 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 278 Write 368 Mixed 343 SusWrite 124 63% 278 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 35.9 4K Mixed 27.1 91% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 88.5 DQ Write 94.5 DQ Mixed 106 76% 96.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 187%
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB 4,594 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 214 223 237 225 228 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 472 Write 179 Mixed 143 SusWrite 219 56% 253 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 23.3 90% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 76.1 DQ Mixed 71.9 90% 169 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HX316C10F/8 4x8GB 224 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	54.6% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 15.8 54% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 17.5 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 73.3 54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	24"	1280 720	GSM5B70 27GL650F

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Performance Q87M-E Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Bytespeed Performance Q87M-E

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	7x
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	5x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	5x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	5x
RTX 3050Nvidia $240Bench 75%, 43,922 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x

SSD
MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 70%, 4,594 samples	7x
SD9SB8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 76%, 255 samples	3x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	2x

RAM
HX316C10F/8 4x8GBKingstonBench 56%, 224 samples	7x
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	3x
BLT8G3D1869DT1TX0. 2x8GBCrucialBench 57%, 2,378 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $150

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16