Bytespeed Performance Q87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics71.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemBytespeed Performance Q87M-E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 05:01
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 162
58% 101 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 337
40% 306 Pts
64-Core 523
32% 523 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.4% Very good
Lighting 88.5
Reflection 89.2
Parallax 82.6
72% 86.8 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 79.8
Splatting 71.6
70% 87.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 2TB 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: ZD0R3G0F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 195 48 46 47 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46% Average
Read 259
Write 338
Mixed 224
SusWrite 124
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 26.5
75% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 85.9
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 122
82% 99 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 46%
Great: 187%
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT09L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 194 203 198 202 205 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 446
Write 180
Mixed 155
SusWrite 197
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 19.8
83% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 82.1
DQ Mixed 80.3
90% 160 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX316C10F/8 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 24" 1280 720 GSM5B70 27GL650F
Typical Performance Q87M-E Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Bytespeed Performance Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $150
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback