Acer Veriton M4618G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton M4618G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M4618G
Memory10.7 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '23 at 02:12
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$128
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 152
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 383
42% 332 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0493) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 56 34 31 45 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 116
Write 109
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 42.1
56% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
492GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 158 159 162 159 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 115
Write 115
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 159
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$31
373GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 74 74 74 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 85.5
Write 80.9
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 74
59% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 76%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
202GB free
Firmware: 01.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 83 83 84 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 85.6
Write 80.2
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 82.9
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 RMR5030EF68F9W1600 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 RMR5030EF68F9W1600 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.2
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 42 60 20.1" 1280 720 HWP26A7 HP w2007
Typical Veriton M4618G Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M4618G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback