Asus PRIME B365M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B365M-C  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 20:09
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 89.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 242
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 711
74% 597 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.31% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 8
6% 8 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.31%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 46 48 49 49 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 456
Write 336
Mixed 297
SusWrite 84.4
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 38.3
129% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 117
95% 134 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 85%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
167GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 747 425 424 424 426 419 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2,442
Write 1,523
Mixed 1,322
SusWrite 477
319% 1,441 MB/s
4K Read 57.3
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 75.8
250% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 958
DQ Mixed 1,072
780% 1,012 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 248%
Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
5GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 148
Write 149
Mixed 73
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB
267GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 94 94 91 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 136
Write 133
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 93.7
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.3
229% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 99%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
72GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 120 120 122 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 136
Write 123
Mixed 90
SusWrite 120
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 88%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 109 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 128
Write 120
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 110
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
718GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 179 182 182 183 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 156
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 182
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
5GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 114
Write 106
Mixed 82.5
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
KINGSTON SA400S37960G 960GB
9GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 39 42 43 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 40.7
Write 40.7
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 34.1
46% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 16.4
622% 9.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 154%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
10GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 79 80 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42% Average
Read 79.7
Write 71.7
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 78.6
97% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSCK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 20.7
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 21.8
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 20 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4D U28E590
Typical PRIME B365M-C Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B365M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback