HP Pro 3505 Series

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	HP Pro 3505 Series (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2ACF
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20121030
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '23 at 09:17
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	73%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-3420 APU 1,139 User benchmarks, average bench 36% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	Memory 45.6 1-Core 28.1 2-Core 38.6 26% 37.4 Pts	4-Core 36.2 8-Core 47.2 5% 41.7 Pts	64-Core 55.5 3% 55.5 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1642 3E56) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.22 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.39% Terrible	Lighting 6.8 Reflection 4.4 Parallax 8.7 6% 6.63 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 6.7 5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.39% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 150 163 162 182 188 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.4% Below average	Read 156 Write 175 Mixed 157 SusWrite 164 37% 163 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 17.8 60% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 98.1 DQ Mixed 106 78% 104 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 128%
CT1000P3 PSSD8 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 844GB free, PID 9210 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 29 29 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 27.4 Mixed 26.4 SusWrite 28.9 38% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 2.9 149% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron CT102464BD160B.C16 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 0 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 8.5 22% 7.67 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5.8 13% 4.7 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	65	52	60	21.5"	1280 720	SAM08A3 S22B150

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pro 3505 Series Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3505 Series

CPU
E2-3200 APUAMDBench 34%, 802 samples	14x
A4-3420 APUAMDBench 36%, 1,139 samples	5x
A6-3620 APUAMDBench 41%, 2,758 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 6370DAMDBench 2%, 517 samples	10x
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	4x
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
CT102464BD160B.C16 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 16GBMicronBench 47%, 7 samples	2x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 29%, 7,230 samples	2x
8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 2x2GBMicronBench 49%, 1,108 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $52

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16