Mousecomputer P5-TGLABW11

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemMousecomputer P5-TGLABW11  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer NP50HH
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 08:05
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 68.5
1-Core 151
2-Core 291
90% 170 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 773
81% 650 Pts
64-Core 879
54% 879 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Clevo(1558 8511) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4629
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
42.6% Average
Lighting 53.3
Reflection 53.2
Parallax 49.4
43% 52 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 47.8
Splatting 43
41% 51.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ256HBJD-00B00 256GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1116 903 134 129 119 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,593
Write 1,137
Mixed 1,196
SusWrite 419
242% 1,086 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 55
186% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 857
DQ Write 798
DQ Mixed 800
608% 819 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 184%
Great: 221%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 29.5
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 17.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUODF87
Typical P5-TGLABW11 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Mousecomputer P5-TGLABW11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback