HP Slim Desktop S01-pF3xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive342% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Slim Desktop S01-pF3xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B3C
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231011
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 07:48
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400-$172
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 57.3
1-Core 189
2-Core 356
102% 201 Pts
4-Core 678
8-Core 1,184
113% 931 Pts
64-Core 1,612
100% 1,612 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
HP(103C 8B3C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3729
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 14
Parallax 8.4
6% 9.87 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 4.5
7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL41T0HBLB-00BH1 1TB
911GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NHAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1774 1862 1943 1959 1956 1400 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2,106
Write 1950
Mixed 1,910
SusWrite 1,815
438% 1,945 MB/s
4K Read 66.8
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 95
306% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,335
DQ Write 992
DQ Mixed 1,146
861% 1,158 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 342%
Great: 342%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44CB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 19.9
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 14.6
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 1 75 27" 1920 1009 SAM707F LF27T35
Typical Slim Desktop S01-pF3xxx Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Slim Desktop S01-pF3xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback