Lenovo 83C4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemLenovo 83C4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230529
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 07:02
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 61.3
1-Core 162
2-Core 298
91% 174 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 931
87% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,153
71% 1,153 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3B3A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 19.1
13% 18.3 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 14.2
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 946 1091 864 924 957 880 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,203
Write 1022
Mixed 950
SusWrite 944
231% 1,030 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 49.9
163% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 568
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 494
340% 429 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 174%
Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A1G16TB-062E:F 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 59 0 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1550
Typical 83C4 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 83C4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback