Asus X442UQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X442UQ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X442UQ
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 03:58
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U VH
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.2% Poor
Memory 4.71
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 166
41% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 243
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 49.7
3% 49.7 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 14AE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 6.8
4% 5.87 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.3
7% 7.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1104J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 265 251 51 64 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 443
Write 398
Mixed 326
SusWrite 169
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 11.4
89% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 15.4
67% 147 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.77 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 20% 15 14 1 0 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14A7
Typical X442UQ Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X442UQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback