Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	66.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Gigabyte H370HD3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '23 at 21:19
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400-$161 22,187 User benchmarks, average bench 86% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Memory 89.2 1-Core 119 2-Core 234 83% 148 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 574 64% 504 Pts	64-Core 458 28% 458 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Nvidia(10DE 1366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.4% Good	Lighting 86.6 Reflection 84.9 Parallax 75.7 71% 82.4 fps	MRender 65.6 Gravity 77.4 Splatting 70 58% 71 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 73%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ldlc F7+240GB 240GB 492 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1127B0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 428 Write 423 Mixed 4.7 63% 285 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 64.4 4K Mixed 1.1 61% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 26.5 DQ Mixed 1.3 20% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 448GB free Firmware: CC43 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 179 Write 183 Mixed 82.2 109% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Intenso Rainbow Line 16GB 816 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 14.2 Write 6.5 Mixed 1.7 8% 7.47 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G30C15U4BL.M8FE 2x8GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	79.9% Very good	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 24.3 83% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 25.9 SC Mixed 17.3 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	56	29	165	23.8"	1280 720	IVM615C PL2470H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H370 HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 74%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	276x
Core i5-8400Intel $120Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	210x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	127x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	69x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	49x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	32x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $616

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16