Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemGigabyte H370HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 25 '23 at 00:20
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 205
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 490
60% 461 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Nvidia(10DE 1366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.5% Good
Lighting 87.4
Reflection 88.2
Parallax 78.9
71% 84.8 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 75.5
Splatting 70
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ldlc F7+240GB 240GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 434
Write 414
Mixed 5.5
62% 284 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.1
35% 8.33 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
308GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 156
Write 149
Mixed 68.6
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G30C15U4BL.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 23.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 21.9
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 23.8" 1280 720 IVM615C PL2470H
Typical GA-H370 HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback