Asus PRIME H410M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H410M-K (all builds)
Memory	19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201019
Uptime	15.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '23 at 20:06
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	65% Good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 64.6 2-Core 145 59% 97.9 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 311 37% 286 Pts	64-Core 275 17% 275 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 8D92) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	43.9% Average	Lighting 54.7 Reflection 56.5 Parallax 50.9 45% 54 fps	MRender 63.8 Gravity 49.8 Splatting 45.8 43% 53.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-480-G3 480GB 934 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 220GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 122 76 73 53 74 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 485 Write 416 Mixed 397 SusWrite 81.3 77% 345 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 90.3 4K Mixed 29.3 133% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 48.9 91% 176 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 95%
Dahua C800 2.5 inch SATA 2TB SSD 4 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: W0509A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 406 416 431 430 434 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	95.8% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 427 Mixed 401 SusWrite 414 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 89.3 4K Mixed 28.6 131% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 46.3 96% 189 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Wilk Elektronik GR2666D464L19/16G 2x16GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	MC Read 29 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 30.1 90% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 31.6 SC Mixed 21.1 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	55	25	60	23.8"	1280 720	AOC2402 24B2W1G5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H410M-K Builds (Compare 2,880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H410M-K

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	1,177x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	621x
Core i5-10400Intel $125Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	275x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $235Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	337x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	251x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	230x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	152x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	139x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	131x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	172x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	58x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $361

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16