HP Laptop 15-da2xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive8.27% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15-da2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86B3
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '23 at 18:09
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Memory 51.3
1-Core 16.3
2-Core 23.8
24% 30.5 Pts
4-Core 37
8-Core 52.6
6% 44.8 Pts
64-Core 87.3
5% 87.3 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 63%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Blackpcs SSDPro 240GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0729A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 45 35 29 36 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.27% Terrible
Read 79.8
Write 72.1
Mixed 71
SusWrite 41.3
15% 66 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 2
8% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 8.27%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 12GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 2
7% 2.43 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 13 11 64 0" 1280 720
Typical Laptop 15-da2xxx Builds (Compare 1,399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-da2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback